Skip to main content

Urgent measure sought before the Brazilian Judiciary in connection with a contract containing an arbitration clause providing for arbitration seated abroad. Alleged gap in the Brazilian Arbitration Act regarding urgent measures related to international arbitration. Unfounded. Admissibility of the measure's review by the Brazilian Judiciary, for the purpose of protecting a possible right while arbitration proceedings already commenced are pending. Grounded on art. 22-A of the Brazilian Arbitration Act:

Subscriber-only content

The full text of the rulings, the texts, and the attachments on this page are part of the Arbipedia collection and are released to subscribers.

Go deeper with our resources and get your questions answered: