Skip to main content

A prior provision of legal services by the arbitrator to one of the parties and its controlling shareholders gives rise to a ground for disqualification. Possibility of declaring the arbitration award null and void by means of a motion to stay execution, even after the lapse of the time limit for the nullity action set forth in Article 33, §3º, in view of subsequent knowledge of the fact:

Subscriber-only content

The full text of the rulings, the texts, and the attachments on this page are part of the Arbipedia collection and are released to subscribers.

Go deeper with our resources and get your questions answered: