Action to void negotiable instruments. Claimant's allegation that the stay of protest of a negotiable instrument and its annulment would not be covered by the arbitration clause, which would apply only to matters relating to the franchise agreement. Dismissal of such allegation. "There is no reservation in the said terms of reference that would allow any controversy between the parties to be examined by the judiciary, since the parties agreed that any matter arising from the franchise agreement would be resolved by mediation or arbitration". Upholding of the dismissal without resolution on the merits: