Skip to main content

Dispute relating to a contract for the transfer of a furniture store to a third party with an alleged guarantee of future profits, which does not contain an arbitration clause. Non-enforceability of the arbitration agreement in the furniture supply contract between the establishment (Michels) and the supplier (Unicasa) against the third-party acquirer of the establishment. Dismissal of the objection based on an arbitration agreement raised by defendant Michels and continuation of the lawsuit for the potential liability of Michels and Unicasa for frustration of the buyer's profit expectations:

Subscriber-only content

The full text of the rulings, the texts, and the attachments on this page are part of the Arbipedia collection and are released to subscribers.

Go deeper with our resources and get your questions answered: