Skip to main content

Action for damages based on a helicopter transportation services agreement. Defendant who terminated the contract by simple notice, remaining silent as to the arbitral tribunal and erroneously stating, in a counter-notice, that the dispute would be resolved before the judiciary. Maintenance of the effectiveness of the arbitration clause even after the termination of the contract, without the need for its reiteration in a subsequent notice:

Subscriber-only content

The full text of the rulings, the texts, and the attachments on this page are part of the Arbipedia collection and are released to subscribers.

Go deeper with our resources and get your questions answered: