Skip to main content

Action for judicial deposit of payment of a debt arising from a lease agreement due to uncertainty as to who the creditor would be. Arbitral award on agreed terms that had defined creditor and debtor. Rejection of the allegation of statute of limitations of the claim to enforce the arbitral award, notwithstanding the fact that it had not been subject to enforcement proceedings, given that the filing of the action for judicial deposit of payment interrupted the limitation period:

Subscriber-only content

The full text of the rulings, the texts, and the attachments on this page are part of the Arbipedia collection and are released to subscribers.

Go deeper with our resources and get your questions answered: