Skip to main content

The subsequent appointment of an arbitrator as attorney for the prevailing party in arbitration proceedings does not, in and of itself, constitute grounds for suspicion or disqualification sufficient to taint the arbitration award:

Subscriber-only content

The full text of the rulings, the texts, and the attachments on this page are part of the Arbipedia collection and are released to subscribers.

Go deeper with our resources and get your questions answered: