Skip to main content

Complaint against a second-instance decision that denied leave to file an extraordinary appeal. Allegation that the exclusion of acts of an arbitration center — as if they were an arbitration award — from judicial review, whether by the arbitral tribunal or by the judiciary, is something that the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court (STF) has never affirmed and that would directly violate Article 5, XXXV, of the Federal Constitution. Allegation of erroneous application of a precedent concerning the "general repercussion" system. Dismissed. A constitutional complaint does not lie to correct the alleged erroneous application of a precedent:

Subscriber-only content

The full text of the rulings, the texts, and the attachments on this page are part of the Arbipedia collection and are released to subscribers.

Go deeper with our resources and get your questions answered: